Skip to content
← Back to blog
freight chargesArticle

An extra freight charge: what was agreed?

A carrier invoice includes an extra charge for a service the logistics coordinator remembers as part of the transport order. The employee reviewing the bill has to find the shipment and check the agreement before asking about that line. Automating freight charge reconciliation can place the charge beside the ordered service and show the document behind the question.

Author

Syntalith

Published Updated 4 min read

Liftgate unloading is already included

Suppose the agreed transport order explicitly includes unloading with a truck's liftgate as part of the freight service. On the invoice for that same shipment, the carrier lists liftgate unloading as an additional charge. The employee checking the invoice sees the extra line but needs the order to explain why it raises a question.

A useful comparison shows the shipment reference and the passage in the order that includes unloading beside that invoice line. The logistics coordinator opens both documents and checks that they concern the same service. They now have a specific question for the carrier: why is there a separate charge for unloading already included in the agreed order? At this point, it is a possible duplicate charge that needs an explanation.

Automation can prepare that comparison for subsequent invoices. The employee starts with the flagged difference and its linked documents. Once a response arrives, they record it with the case so a billing colleague can see what was established. The responsible employees assess the explanation and decide how to handle the invoice.

Connect the charge to the right shipment

An invoice covering many shipments first requires finding the transport order for a particular line. The carrier and month alone are not enough. The employee needs a reference that leads from the billed service to the shipment and its agreed terms. If they currently copy reference numbers into a search box or spreadsheet, that is a useful part of the work to connect across systems.

With the correct order open, the employee compares the described service with the invoice line. Both descriptions should be visible together so the coordinator understands why a difference was flagged and can correct a mistaken match. If the agreed order is missing, it needs to be found before assessing the additional charge.

Check your transportation system's capabilities

Microsoft describes reconciling estimated freight bills with carrier invoices in Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management. Matching can be manual or automatic; unmatched invoices require employee handling. If your company uses this capability, check whether the existing view includes the lines and agreed terms your logistics team needs.

When charges and services are already structured in the system, configuration or an integration with the billing application may be sufficient. A language model is unnecessary for comparing clearly identified lines. For a small number of shipments, a spreadsheet linked to transport orders may also be enough if employees can readily find the basis for a comparison.

AI has a more specific role when carriers use different document layouts or describe services differently. It can help read the content and suggest which service a charge belongs to. If the system misreads document fields, that needs correcting first. Comparing the invoice with the shipment terms depends on having the right information from each document.

Some discrepancies require a wider search, such as finding correspondence about an event during delivery. Our article on investigating invoice discrepancies with an AI agent covers that work.

What to commission when the comparison repeats every month

If your team regularly searches for transport orders to explain extra charges, a proposed Syntalith project connects invoice lines to shipments and prepares a comparison for the logistics coordinator. Beside a flagged difference, the employee can open the service terms and record an explanation. The aim is to give them a specific case to review without first gathering documents from several places.

The initial scope can cover a selected group of carriers or one invoice workflow. Your team identifies where agreed services are recorded and who investigates additional charges. Syntalith connects that information with the invoice lines; document reading can be included where the formats require it.

For a conversation about automating freight reconciliation, describe an extra charge that recently sent an employee looking for an earlier agreement. Explain where they found the transport order and who received their question. This helps identify which repeated work the solution should take over. See Syntalith's pricing page for pricing information.

Reduce manual work in a defined process

Start with where work gets stuck and who has to repair it. We will compare the available improvements with implementation and operating costs.

Explore AI automation
Discuss an automation