Skip to content

Blog · Published · Updated

Permission before action: how the workflow works

Short answer

An AI agent's access to a tool should not mean the right to every operation. A separate policy layer checks the identity, the resource and the context before each call and returns allow, deny or a requirement for a second approval, with a record of the rule applied. At Syntalith an agent costs from €3,000 net, and with 2,000 agent actions a month at 3 minutes each it pays back in 1.1 months.

How we workDetails ↓

  1. 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
  2. 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
  3. 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
  4. 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
analysis with an engineer and a free prototype
€0
team in ChatGPT or Claude, up to 10 people
from €1,150
automation, agent or application for one process
from €3,000

We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓

Author: Syntalith · 3 min read

Example: the morning request inbox
Agent · ready

Statistics

Agents and security: statistics 2026

1.1 mo.

payback of a €3,000 agent at 2,000 agent actions a month: €3,490 of work today, €707 with checking and the model. Scenario.

Figures checked: 22 October 2026

Is the agent allowed to perform this operation

An agent working across several systems proposes actions: reading a document, changing a customer record, a correction in the finance system. Each request carries an identity, a data class and whether the action can be undone. A separate permission check decides before the call: a forbidden action stops before the system, and a high-risk action waits for a second approval. Each decision records the rule, its version, who performed the action and the approval required.

This matters with content from outside. OWASP describes prompt injection as the number one risk for applications built on language models: an instruction hidden in a document or an email can push the model to try a forbidden operation. The policy layer works outside the model, so such an attempt stops at the rule.

One agent request
  1. 01Proposalthe agent proposes an action in a system
  2. 02Contextthe identity, the resource, the data class and whether it can be undone
  3. 03Policyallow, deny or a requirement for a second approval
  4. 04Recordthe rule, its version, the performer and the reason for the decision
  5. 05Executiononly after approval, before the system is called
The scope of evidence in the demonstrator
  • Local, fictional stand-ins for three systems and identities
  • About €0.0007 to prepare a request, with a separate check taking the decision
  • A test of protecting the audit record run once
  • No evidence of credential rotation, high availability or production load

What a policy layer for AI agents costs and when it pays back

Scenario: 2,000 agent actions a month
Today
2,000 agent actions × 3 min = 100 h × €34.90 = €3,490
With the system, a person checks the output in 20% of the time
€698
Model, 1 call per case, Claude Sonnet 5.5
€9
Cost of one case
€1.75 today, €0.35 with the system
Saving
€2,783 a month

Payback of €3,000

1.1 months

The volume, the time and the checking share are the scenario's assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat. Model: 1,500 input tokens and 200 output tokens per call at Anthropic's rates, converted at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.

The count covers the work around a case: searching, reading, writing and passing it on. What stays is the time to check the output, 20% of today's work in the scenario. Before we quote, we measure both times on 20 to 100 cases your team has already handled, in a €0 test that takes 5 working days.

The scenario compares today's manual approval of every agent action with a policy layer after which a person approves only high-risk actions. The share of those actions, 20% of today's work, is an assumption to check against the client's rules.

When permissions in the systems themselves are enough

If the agent works in one system and its account has narrow permissions set by the administrator, a separate policy layer may be unnecessary. The layer makes sense when the agent works across several systems and the same operation is allowed for one department and forbidden for another, or when some actions need a second approval depending on the amount or the data class. List the allowed operations and the owners of the rules, start with one tool and test the allowed and forbidden combinations of identity and resource. The risk of instructions hidden in documents is covered in the article on prompt injection in AI agents.

System permissions or a policy layer
  • One system, a narrow agent account

    permissions set by the administrator

    configuration

  • Several systems, rules that depend on the department

    a policy layer before the calls

    an agent from €3,000

  • Actions involving amounts or sensitive data

    a policy layer with a second approval

    priced after the review

Where to start

To prepare: a list of the operations the agent should perform, the owners of the rules in each system and examples of allowed and forbidden requests. The people responsible for the systems approve the roles, the exceptions and the actions that need a second approval. We build this kind of rollout as part of AI agents. For the free process review, a description of one case from recent weeks and the tools it went through is enough. You do not need to send confidential documents, and you get a written plan within 2 working days.

Worked example · Scenario

How we count the payback: an IT team

We run the same count for your systems in the free process review.

€4,188

a month for searching the documentation for answers to 600 questions

Payback: 0.8 mo.

12 minutes to find an answer or ask a colleague and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 6,000 + 500 tokens per answer from the documents, at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.

See the full calculation →

Client results.

All projects →
foap.comcustomer service

foap.com customer service: 95% of replies are sent automatically.

Users from several countries write to foap.com, in several languages. The system reads the entire conversation and the terms of that person, and then sends a response in that person's language. Questions about money and exceptions go to the team with a ready draft, so they have to check and send them.

the system sends the answers itself, without human typing
95%
time from the arrival of the e-mail to the ready response (median)
30 s
e-mails that require a response receive a ready-made draft
100%
less work for every 1000 answers (estimate)
47 h

Data from foap.com production, October 20-21, 2026. Estimate: 3 minutes for handwritten response.

How foap.com customer service works →
Sample messages. Money matters always come to the person.

Other implementations

jaktako.design

studio projektowe

−87%

Time to look for new customers, every day

4 hours → 30 min

approx. 73 hours less per month (21 days of work)

according to the studio

How the agent loop works →
Signature Estates

real estate

approx. −90%

Operator time spent browsing portals, per day

2–3 hours → 20 min

approx. 45 hours less per month (21 days of work)

respect · contact the seller 5 minutes after the announcement

How the agent finds property listings →
Kuba Koziej, CEO and co-founder of MoreGrowth and board member at Natu.Care

Kuba Koziej

CEO and co-founder, MoreGrowth

„We started with my own AI agent. During the training that followed, I learned to build new applications myself. Today I am bringing this way of working with AI into my business. Working with Syntalith gave me exactly the skills and tools I needed.”

View the original training review on LinkedIn ↗

Start with the process that takes the most time each week.Book a free process review (30 min) →

How we build automation and agents

From a conversation to a working system in four steps.

  1. 01 · 30 min

    Free process review

    €0

    You're talking to an engineer. You receive the written plan within 2 business days.

  2. 02 · 5 days

    Free prototype

    €0

    The system works on 20-100 cases that your team has already handled. You see every result.

  3. 03 · 2–16 weeks

    Build

    50%

    Fixed price and goal written in the contract. First installment upon signing.

  4. 04 · after reaching the goal

    Reception

    50%

    You pay the second installment when the system reaches its target on your cases.

How a free prototype is created

Mon.

We set a goal

What result do you consider good?

Tue–Wed

The system is working

It goes through your affairs, one by one.

Thu

We compare

We check every difference with the team's work.

Fri

Result and price

List of errors and fixed implementation price.

You choose the matters. We anonymize them upon request, they stay in the EU and we delete them after the test.

On the market, such a test usually costs from PLN 3,000 to PLN 8,000.

Book a free process review (30 min)

We establish a prototype during a free analysis.

Data checked on October 25, 2026.

„Is my data safe?”

Yes. You choose where they go: from your company account to the model on your server.

  1. 00Employee's private account

    Customer and company data ends up in an account that the company cannot see or control. There is no data processing agreement, so it is a violation of the GDPR. When an employee leaves, the chat history goes with them.

  2. 01ChatGPT or Claude corporate account

    The provider does not use your data to train models. A copy of the queries remains in his logs for up to 30 days.

  3. 02API with zero retention (ZDR)

    The provider processes the request and does not save anything. It requires his consent, we prepare the application together.

  4. 03Processing in the EU

    Queries are counted and stored in Europe: OpenAI in the EU region, Claude via clouds with the EU region.

  5. 04Model at your place

    The open model runs on your server or in your cloud in the EU. The data does not go outside the company.

What we do with every implementation

  • Confidentiality agreement and data processing agreement before we receive any data.
  • You choose the cases for the prototype and we anonymize them upon request.
  • The data stays in the EU and we delete it after the test.
  • Corporate accounts with an administrator on your side.

When data cannot leave the company

The open model runs on your server or in your cloud in the EU. To choose from:

White-tailed eagle
Polish model, SpeakLeash and ACK Cyfronet AGH
PLLUM
Polish model, HIVE consortium commissioned by the Ministry of Digitization
Qwen
Alibaba
GLM
Zhipu AI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek

We select a model for the task and check it on your cases. We run it, tune it and maintain it.

Source: Bielik and PLLuM, ACK Cyfronet AGH ↗ · PLLuM, Ministry of Digitization ↗

Do you have a lot of your own data? We will fine-tune the small model.

  1. 1 Your examples
  2. 2 tuning
  3. 3 test on new cases
  4. 4 model at your place

When you have thousands of similar emails, documents or reports, we teach a small open model based on your examples. It works for you, responds quickly and costs less to maintain than a large model. We measure quality on issues that the model has not seen while learning.

Przemysław and Piotr did it in large programming and consulting companies. Artem did it before and does it today at Syntalith. It's about models on your own infrastructure, tuning and quality measurement.

You choose the protection level during the interview. We sign the data processing agreement before we see any data.Schedule a free analysis →

AI implementation

Start with the process that takes the most time each week.

The engineer chooses one process with you and calculates how much it costs today. Then we build a free prototype on 20-100 cases that your team has already handled. We write down the goal and the fixed price in the contract.

See AI implementation →
analysis with an engineer and a free prototype
€0
team in ChatGPT or Claude, up to 10 people
from €1,150
automation, agent or application for one process
from €3,000

Questions

  • How do you limit an AI agent's permissions?

    With a separate policy layer before every tool call. It checks the identity, the resource and the context and returns allow, deny or a requirement for a second approval, and records each decision with the rule and its version.

  • Does a policy layer protect against prompt injection?

    It limits the effects. An instruction hidden in a document can push the model to try a forbidden operation, and a rule outside the model stops it before the system is called.

  • How much does such an agent cost?

    At Syntalith from €3,000 net. With 2,000 agent actions a month at 3 minutes each, the payback is 1.1 months. We agree integrations and maintenance before the quote, and the model costs €9 a month.

Let's talk

Just write, call or choose a date.

We work fast because we hate corporate cotton wool. We don't have salespeople or managers to keep an eye on managers. You talk immediately to engineers who then build your system. We respect each other's time and yours too.

We will accept 3 more companies by the end of the year.

Mon–Fri 9:00–17:00 CET

What our OpenAI and Anthropic partnerships mean for you.

OpenAI makes ChatGPT and Anthropic makes Claude. We belong to the partnership programs of both companies, so we work with their tools every day and learn from the creators themselves.

OpenAI Select PartnerClaude Partner Network
01We will select a tool for the task
We implement both ChatGPT and Claude. We check both on your documents, and you choose the one that makes fewer corrections and saves more time.
02Knowledge straight from the creators
We learn from official OpenAI and Anthropic courses and materials. Your team learns about the features and settings that work today.
03Licenses without our margin
When we roll out ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot, you buy the licences directly from OpenAI, Anthropic or Microsoft and they invoice you. We add nothing to the licence.
04Certified engineers
On the team, we have an AWS certification in machine learning and an Anthropic certification in systems architecture on Claude.

Participation in programs does not mean that OpenAI or Anthropic endorses our services.