Skip to content

Blog · Published · Updated

Supplier statement reconciliation automation

Short answer

Supplier statement reconciliation automation shows matching items and differences with an explanation: a payment sent but not yet settled, a credit note with a different reference, or one amount covering several invoices. Rules compare the identifiers and amounts, and the model helps only with unusual descriptions. At Syntalith the automation costs from €3,000 net, and at 150 supplier reconciliations a month of 25 minutes each it pays back in 1.8 months.

How we workDetails ↓

  1. 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
  2. 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
  3. 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
  4. 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
net for the automation of one process, build paid once
from €3,000
from signing the contract to acceptance
2–6 weeks
free prototype on your cases
€0

We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓

Author: Syntalith · 3 min read

Example: the morning request inbox
Agent · ready

Statistics

Finance and automation: statistics 2026

1.8 mo.

payback of a €3,000 automation at 150 supplier reconciliations a month: €2,181 of work today, €547 with checking and the model. Scenario.

Figures checked: 22 October 2026

First decide which problem you are buying a fix for

A supplier statement and the company ledger describe the same events in different ways. A payment has been sent but not yet settled. A credit note carries a different reference. One amount covers several invoices. Comparing the totals will not explain any of this.

If collecting the files takes most of the time, the project is about getting and preparing the data. If people spend a long time looking for the links between items, you need record matching. When differences require contact with the supplier or another department, the work is exception handling. These scopes can be built in one project, but the quote lists them separately: otherwise the result is judged by the number of documents while the cost sits in the exceptions.

Type of workStarting point
Uniform exports from the systemsrules and integration
Statements in different formatsdata preparation and checks
Unclear item descriptionshelp with interpretation, with the source shown
A dispute about a deliveryhandover to the owner of the case
Reconciling a supplier balance
  1. 01Datathe supplier statement and the ledger entries
  2. 02Matchingidentifiers, amounts, currencies and dates by rules
  3. 03Differencespayments in transit, credit notes, combined amounts
  4. 04Exceptionsdisputes go to the owner of the case
  5. 05Approvalthe finance team approves how each difference is read
A pilot on the hard cases
  • Credit notes and partial payments
  • Different currencies
  • Mismatched periods
  • Suppliers whose statements vary in layout

What supplier reconciliation automation costs and when it pays back

Scenario: 150 suppliers to reconcile a month
Today
150 suppliers to reconcile × 25 min = 62.5 h (€2,181)
With the system, a person checks the output in 25% of the time
€545
Model, 1 call per case, Claude Sonnet 5.5
€1.84
Cost of one case
€14.54 today, €3.65 with the system
Saving
€1,634 a month

Payback of €3,000

1.8 months

The volume, the time and the checking share are the scenario's assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat. Model: 4,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per call at Anthropic's rates, converted at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.

The count covers the work around a case: searching, reading, writing and passing things on. What stays is the time to check the result, 25% of today's work in this scenario. Before the quote we measure both times on 20 to 100 cases the team has already handled, in a free test that takes 5 working days.

The scenario assumes 150 reconciliations a month of 25 minutes each. A useful pilot result is a list of matching items, differences and the material to judge them, with a way back to the source for every item.

Where rules are enough and where the model helps

Identifiers, amounts, currencies and dates can be compared without ambiguity. A language model helps with an unusual item description or with reading a message, but it does not replace an arithmetic check. Before a build, check the features of your current finance system, because a module you already have may be enough. A match proposed by the system is no basis for changing the ledger or a payment: those actions have their own permissions. An electronic invoice does not reconcile every event with a supplier. You count the running cost per unit, for example per reconciled supplier, as FinOps describes.

Module, rules or model
  • The finance system has reconciliation

    configure the module

    no build

  • Several systems, uniform exports

    matching automation by rules

    from €3,000

  • Different formats and unclear descriptions

    rules with AI reading and the source shown

    from €3,000

Where to start

A pilot needs representative statements together with the company's entries, including the difficult suppliers, because picking only the easy ones distorts the result. Cost invoices are covered by cost invoice automation. We build this kind of system as part of our AI automations. For the free analysis, a description of one case from the last few weeks and the tools it went through is enough. You do not need to send confidential documents, and you get a written plan within 2 working days.

Worked example · Scenario

How we count the payback: balance reconciliations

We run the same count for your suppliers in the free analysis.

€2,094

a month for preparing 20 reports

Payback: 1.7 mo.

3 hours to collect the data and prepare a report and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: checking the commentary in our reporting system (about €0.0002) plus compiling the data (Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 30,000 + 2,000 tokens), at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.

See the full calculation →

This is how we implement it in companies

All case studies →

Client results.

All projects →
foap.comcustomer service

foap.com customer service: 95% of replies are sent automatically.

Users from several countries write to foap.com, in several languages. The system reads the entire conversation and the terms of that person, and then sends a response in that person's language. Questions about money and exceptions go to the team with a ready draft, so they have to check and send them.

the system sends the answers itself, without human typing
95%
time from the arrival of the e-mail to the ready response (median)
30 s
e-mails that require a response receive a ready-made draft
100%
less work for every 1000 answers (estimate)
47 h

Data from foap.com production, October 20-21, 2026. Estimate: 3 minutes for handwritten response.

How foap.com customer service works →
Sample messages. Money matters always come to the person.

Other implementations

jaktako.design

studio projektowe

−87%

Time to look for new customers, every day

4 hours → 30 min

approx. 73 hours less per month (21 days of work)

according to the studio

How the agent loop works →
Signature Estates

real estate

approx. −90%

Operator time spent browsing portals, per day

2–3 hours → 20 min

approx. 45 hours less per month (21 days of work)

respect · contact the seller 5 minutes after the announcement

How the agent finds property listings →
Kuba Koziej, CEO and co-founder of MoreGrowth and board member at Natu.Care

Kuba Koziej

CEO and co-founder, MoreGrowth

„We started with my own AI agent. During the training that followed, I learned to build new applications myself. Today I am bringing this way of working with AI into my business. Working with Syntalith gave me exactly the skills and tools I needed.”

View the original training review on LinkedIn ↗

This process can go on its own. You will check this on your cases before you pay.Book a free process review (30 min) →

How we build automation and agents

From a conversation to a working system in four steps.

  1. 01 · 30 min

    Free process review

    €0

    You're talking to an engineer. You receive the written plan within 2 business days.

  2. 02 · 5 days

    Free prototype

    €0

    The system works on 20-100 cases that your team has already handled. You see every result.

  3. 03 · 2–16 weeks

    Build

    50%

    Fixed price and goal written in the contract. First installment upon signing.

  4. 04 · after reaching the goal

    Reception

    50%

    You pay the second installment when the system reaches its target on your cases.

How a free prototype is created

Mon.

We set a goal

What result do you consider good?

Tue–Wed

The system is working

It goes through your affairs, one by one.

Thu

We compare

We check every difference with the team's work.

Fri

Result and price

List of errors and fixed implementation price.

You choose the matters. We anonymize them upon request, they stay in the EU and we delete them after the test.

On the market, such a test usually costs from PLN 3,000 to PLN 8,000.

Book a free process review (30 min)

We establish a prototype during a free analysis.

Data checked on October 25, 2026.

„Is my data safe?”

Yes. You choose where they go: from your company account to the model on your server.

  1. 00Employee's private account

    Customer and company data ends up in an account that the company cannot see or control. There is no data processing agreement, so it is a violation of the GDPR. When an employee leaves, the chat history goes with them.

  2. 01ChatGPT or Claude corporate account

    The provider does not use your data to train models. A copy of the queries remains in his logs for up to 30 days.

  3. 02API with zero retention (ZDR)

    The provider processes the request and does not save anything. It requires his consent, we prepare the application together.

  4. 03Processing in the EU

    Queries are counted and stored in Europe: OpenAI in the EU region, Claude via clouds with the EU region.

  5. 04Model at your place

    The open model runs on your server or in your cloud in the EU. The data does not go outside the company.

What we do with every implementation

  • Confidentiality agreement and data processing agreement before we receive any data.
  • You choose the cases for the prototype and we anonymize them upon request.
  • The data stays in the EU and we delete it after the test.
  • Corporate accounts with an administrator on your side.

When data cannot leave the company

The open model runs on your server or in your cloud in the EU. To choose from:

White-tailed eagle
Polish model, SpeakLeash and ACK Cyfronet AGH
PLLUM
Polish model, HIVE consortium commissioned by the Ministry of Digitization
Qwen
Alibaba
GLM
Zhipu AI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek

We select a model for the task and check it on your cases. We run it, tune it and maintain it.

Source: Bielik and PLLuM, ACK Cyfronet AGH ↗ · PLLuM, Ministry of Digitization ↗

Do you have a lot of your own data? We will fine-tune the small model.

  1. 1 Your examples
  2. 2 tuning
  3. 3 test on new cases
  4. 4 model at your place

When you have thousands of similar emails, documents or reports, we teach a small open model based on your examples. It works for you, responds quickly and costs less to maintain than a large model. We measure quality on issues that the model has not seen while learning.

Przemysław and Piotr did it in large programming and consulting companies. Artem did it before and does it today at Syntalith. It's about models on your own infrastructure, tuning and quality measurement.

You choose the protection level during the interview. We sign the data processing agreement before we see any data.Schedule a free analysis →

AI automations

This process can go on its own. You will check this on your cases before you pay.

The system takes over repetitive work from emails, documents and spreadsheets, and hands over uncertain matters to a human. A prototype for 20-100 cases that your team has already handled costs €0. You pay the other half of the price when the system reaches your goal.

See AI automations →
net for the automation of one process, build paid once
from €3,000
from signing the contract to acceptance
2–6 weeks
free prototype on your cases
€0

Questions

  • How do you automate supplier statement reconciliation?

    Separate getting the data, matching the items and handling the exceptions. Rules compare the identifiers and amounts, the model helps with unclear descriptions, and differences go to the finance team with an explanation.

  • Can the system correct the ledger on its own after reconciliation?

    It should not. A match is a proposal. Changing the ledger and making a payment have their own permissions and need a decision from the person responsible.

  • How much does this automation cost?

    At Syntalith from €3,000 net. At 150 supplier reconciliations a month of 25 minutes each, the payback is 1.8 months. We agree integrations and maintenance before the quote, and the model costs about €2 a month.

Let's talk

Just write, call or choose a date.

We work fast because we hate corporate cotton wool. We don't have salespeople or managers to keep an eye on managers. You talk immediately to engineers who then build your system. We respect each other's time and yours too.

We will accept 3 more companies by the end of the year.

Mon–Fri 9:00–17:00 CET

What our OpenAI and Anthropic partnerships mean for you.

OpenAI makes ChatGPT and Anthropic makes Claude. We belong to the partnership programs of both companies, so we work with their tools every day and learn from the creators themselves.

OpenAI Select PartnerClaude Partner Network
01We will select a tool for the task
We implement both ChatGPT and Claude. We check both on your documents, and you choose the one that makes fewer corrections and saves more time.
02Knowledge straight from the creators
We learn from official OpenAI and Anthropic courses and materials. Your team learns about the features and settings that work today.
03Licenses without our margin
When we roll out ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot, you buy the licences directly from OpenAI, Anthropic or Microsoft and they invoice you. We add nothing to the licence.
04Certified engineers
On the team, we have an AWS certification in machine learning and an Anthropic certification in systems architecture on Claude.

Participation in programs does not mean that OpenAI or Anthropic endorses our services.