Skip to content

Work and systems

Investment teamfundusz inwestycyjny

48 companies rated in the hour before the analyst opens the first one.

The fund's analysts wasted time organizing lists, searching for data in the National Court Register and reconstructing the history of companies. Now the AI makes the first assessment of the entire list. Each company receives an assessment, risks and sources. The analyst starts with a decision.

It works for the client.

to evaluate 48 companies, from list to verdict
1 hour 2 minutes
questions on every company, with a source beside each answer
11
analyst's time per company instead of 30–45 minutes (estimate)
5 min

Record from a running system. The analyst's time is respected. Last checked: October 22, 2026.

Before the analyst rated the company, he spent hours collecting data about it.

The company lists came in various formats. Data from the National Court Register, finances and information from the Internet had to be collected manually. When the company returned to the next list, its history was replayed.

  1. 01

    Clear criteria

    Companies that are too small or have a different ownership structure are eliminated immediately.

  2. 02

    Data with source

    Every answer about a company must indicate where it comes from.

  3. 03

    Memory

    The company that returns has previous assessments and notes with it.

From a list of companies to a ready profile in four steps.

  1. 01

    The list goes into the system

    The system organizes the file and checks whether anything is missing.

  2. 02

    Hard rules

    Finance, scale and ownership screen out companies that would have gone out of business anyway.

  3. 03

    AI investigates the rest

    Collects data from the National Court Register, finances and the Internet. Answers 11 questions with sources.

  4. 04

    The analyst decides

    He gets a profile with a rating and risks. Approves every contact with the company.

What the system does and what is left to the analyst.

Makes a system

  • Screens out companies that do not meet the criteria
  • Collects data and provides the source of each answer
  • He remembers the company's previous assessments
  • Prepares a draft of the first message to the management board

The analyst decides

  • Is the company worth talking to?
  • Changing the rating when it knows more than the system
  • Sending every message

Statistics: how long will it take for the first evaluation of an AI company in 2026.

According to the recording from the operating system (2026), the assessment of 48 companies, from file to verdict, lasted 1 hour and 2 minutes.

According to our estimates, the analyst spends 5 minutes on the first assessment of the company instead of 30-45 minutes.

One run can cover approximately 10,000 companies.

About 60% of the list drops out on hard rules before the AI starts working. It's respect.

Analyst's time for the first assessment of one company

Respect. The "manual" bar is the middle of the 30-45 minute range.

What stays with the analyst?

Investment decision
The system prepares the material. People evaluate and decide.
The shortcomings are visible
When data is missing or uncertain, the profile says so directly.
All contact with consent
The analyst approves and sends each message to the company himself.

This is what an analyst's job is like.

Screens from a running system. Company and account names are blurred.

  1. Zobacz wynik przebiegu
    01Zobacz wynik przebieguAnalityk widzi całą listę po pierwszej ocenie.
  2. Otwórz profil spółki
    02Otwórz profil spółkiDecyzja opiera się na jednym profilu ze źródłami.
  3. Dopytaj agenta w Telegramie
    03Dopytaj agenta w TelegramiePogłębiona analiza jest gotowa w kilka minut.

Does your team also manually review long lists of companies?

Describe your process to us. We will show the prototype on your process and your data. The analysis and prototype cost €0, and you know the fixed implementation price before the contract.

What our OpenAI and Anthropic partnerships mean for you.

OpenAI makes ChatGPT and Anthropic makes Claude. We belong to the partnership programs of both companies, so we work with their tools every day and learn from the creators themselves.

OpenAI Select PartnerClaude Partner Network
01We will select a tool for the task
We implement both ChatGPT and Claude. We check both on your documents, and you choose the one that makes fewer corrections and saves more time.
02Knowledge straight from the creators
We learn from official OpenAI and Anthropic courses and materials. Your team learns about the features and settings that work today.
03Licenses without our margin
When we roll out ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot, you buy the licences directly from OpenAI, Anthropic or Microsoft and they invoice you. We add nothing to the licence.
04Certified engineers
On the team, we have an AWS certification in machine learning and an Anthropic certification in systems architecture on Claude.

Participation in programs does not mean that OpenAI or Anthropic endorses our services.