Training for the team
AI training in finance and controlling
We conduct workshops on preparing comments on data and questions needed to explain deviations. The price starts from €1,150 net per day. Participants practice working with the source, controlling the explanation generated by AI and editing the material for a business recipient.
- net per day of closed training for the team
- from €1,150
- people in one training group
- up to 15
- after this time, we measure the effect on the same tasks
- 30 days
- conversation with an engineer and a written plan within 2 business days
- €0
or call+48 888 78 48 78WhatsAppMon–Fri 9:00–17:00 CET
We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓
Statistics
How much does AI training for finance and controlling cost and when does it pay off?
Short answer
AI training for finance and controlling costs from €1,150 net per day. In our Polish cost example, a PLN 4,900 training fee pays back in 2.6 months: 10 people save an hour a week, and after the licenses they have PLN 1,905 left per month. The team practices deviation comments, tallies and number checking. We measure task time before the training and after 30 days.
70,9%
According to Eurostat (2025), 70.9% of companies in the EU that have considered AI but are not using it cited a lack of knowledge within the team as the reason.
62%
According to ESET and DAGMA (2026), 62% of people working with computers use AI at work.
Source: ESET and DAGMA, Cyberportrait of Polish business (2026) ↗
14–56%
According to Anthropic (2025), in studies with a control group, time savings were lower: from 14% to 56%.
Source: Anthropic, Estimating AI productivity gains (2025) ↗
Figures checked: 22 October 2026
Scope step by step
First comparable data
Before the session, we select the type of report and determine which data can be fed into the tool. The exercise starts with describing the period, unit, and table range. Participants check the calculation results in the worksheet or another agreed source. AI can help formulate questions, but the smoothness of the comment does not guarantee a correct calculation.
Let's assume that one file contains the costs of the entire quarter, and another only the last month. The generated comment describes the difference as a drop in costs. The participant should pause the interpretation and point out the needed comparative material. The correction also includes eliminating the cause of the drop, which the data do not confirm.
Comment for the person responsible for the budget
The second part may involve converting the analyst's note into a shorter explanation. The author maintains the information about the gaps and separates the observed change from the hypothesis about its cause. The author prepares a question for the cost owner, when the table is not sufficient to resolve the issue.
The facilitator refers to specific comments: incomparable periods, omitted unit, or overly certain conclusion. After the correction, the participant receives new material, where the periods are consistent, but part of the values are given in thousands. The independent task checks whether the participant notices the change in the unit and considers it in the comment.
If the group is preparing materials for the management, you can practice a summary with a reference to the source table. The scope of the training does not include investment decisions or tax opinions. It also does not replace the agreement of data in the company's financial system.
Group selection
The controller analyst and the person presenting the results may work on the same material, but they need different exercises. Before the evaluation, we establish roles, used tools, and experience with AI. Beginners get time to familiarize themselves with the environment; regular users can work on a more complex comment.
To prepare the program, it is enough to describe the report. The sessions themselves can use fictional data, without information about customers or employees. The company approves the scope of materials and the tool allowed for their processing.
Evaluation and further work
In the offer, we define the length of the program, preparation of materials, and the way of discussing the work. Additional sessions and support after the workshop require agreement. Licenses are purchased by the client, and configuration of the environment or data integration is a separate order.
Describe the report, its recipient, and the most common questions for the comment. For teams working with market information, the addition is a guide for AI training for the treasury department.
How much does the training cost and when does it pay off
The training starts at €1,150 net per day. We calculate the return on one process, without assumptions about the entire company.
- Time savings
- 43.3 hours/month
- Value of time
- 2,877 PLN
- ChatGPT Business Licenses
- 250 USD (972 PLN)
- Remaining after licenses
- 1,905 PLN/month
Return on training for 4,900 PLN
2.6 months
10 people × 1 hour weekly × 4.33 weeks = 43.3 hours. We cautiously assume an hour of savings per person weekly and check it with time measurement of tasks before and after 30 days. An hour of work at 66.45 PLN is the average wage according to GUS from September 2026, including employer costs. Licenses: ChatGPT Business Standard 25 USD per place monthly, NBP exchange rate 3.8889 PLN. If the team already has licenses, the return is faster.
According to a study published in Science (2023), the time for writing tasks with ChatGPT has dropped by 40%. That is why the scenario adopts a cautious weekly hour and checks it with measurement.
„I already use AI.”
Your people too. Just no rules.
From our conversations with companies
5 na 10 employees paste sensitive data into private AI accounts: contracts, invoices, customer data.
In ESET survey (2026)
1 na 10 admits this in the survey.
Customer data pasted into a private AI account without an data processing agreement is a violation of the GDPR.
Don't worry, we won't tell anyone :)
What do we see in companies that "already use"
- Only ChatGPT or Claude accounts, without plugins, skills, integrations and MCP servers with company tools.
- Company programs are not connected to AI. People still click through systems and Excel, and enter chat data manually.
- Lack of company standards: everyone writes instructions in their own way, no one shares what works.
- No rules for personal data, GDPR and company secrets.
- No limits and no visibility: no one knows who uses AI, how much and for what.
62% Polish employees use AI at work · 27% companies have written rules for working with AI.
Source: ESET and DAGMA, Cyberportrait of Polish business 2026 (March 2026, 1,026 people) ↗
ChatGPT or Claude space review
Accounts, permissions, rules for working with data and 5 tasks set for the team. 1 day.
€450 net
Training on your team's tasks, from €1,150 net per day.See range and price →
Scope and price
From €1,150 net per day
We determine the program, number of groups and time to discuss the work before the quote.
1:1 course participants
People we've trained one-on-one.

Kuba Koziej
CEO and co-founder, MoreGrowth
View the original training review on LinkedIn ↗„We started with my own AI agent. During the training that followed, I learned to build new applications myself. Today I am bringing this way of working with AI into my business. Working with Syntalith gave me exactly the skills and tools I needed.”
„A large stream of documents passes my desk every week. I now review, draft and prepare them with Claude in a fraction of the time, and research that used to eat an afternoon takes minutes. It is wired into the services I already work in, so the documents reach me instead of me hunting for them.”
Hlib UtkinPublic administration„I came in using coding agents ad hoc and left orchestrating them: loops, an agent kanban, a full development cycle that ships. What stayed with me is running context and cost on purpose, and building my own harnesses instead of waiting for a tool to ship one. It changed how I work day to day.”
Ivan ChepurinSenior Software Engineer, Immutable„I run a design studio, not an engineering team, and I still left with something working. We built an agent loop that pulls in leads and keeps an eye on the competition, and I put my own site together with Claude. It was hands-on, on my real work, not a talk about AI.”
Oleksandr UsykCo-founder & Art director, jakotako.design
Let's talk
Just write, call or choose a date.
We work fast because we hate corporate cotton wool. We don't have salespeople or managers to keep an eye on managers. You talk immediately to engineers who then build your system. We respect each other's time and yours too.
We will accept 3 more companies by the end of the year.
- Write
- contact@syntalith.ai
- Call
- +48 888 78 48 78
- write on WhatsApp
Mon–Fri 9:00–17:00 CET