Blog · Published · Updated
IT asset tracking: standard software or custom?
Short answer
An equipment register should show whether a returned laptop is ready to hand out, without checking a spreadsheet and a record in the ITSM. A ready register, for example Snipe-IT, tells a return apart from readiness. An integration or your own app makes sense when the team still retypes data between HR and the asset records.
How we workDetails ↓
- 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
- 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
- 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
- 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
- net per application, fixed price before contract
- from €3,000
- from signing the contract to acceptance
- 4–10 weeks
- free prototype on your documents
- €0
We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓
Author: Syntalith · 5 min read
Statistics
IT and AI: statistics 2026
3.1 mo.
payback of €3,000 at 300 equipment events a month: €1,396 of work today, €422 with checking and the model. Scenario.
50%
According to the European Commission (2026), half of EU SMEs and mid-caps name high investment costs as a barrier to AI.
Source: European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 578 (2026) ↗
20.0%
According to Eurostat (2025), 20.0% of EU companies with at least 10 employees used AI.
52.7%
According to Eurostat (2025), 52.7% of EU enterprises used paid cloud computing services.
59%
According to Microsoft and LinkedIn (2024), 59% of leaders worry about quantifying the productivity gains of AI.
Source: Microsoft and LinkedIn, Work Trend Index 2024 (2024) ↗
Figures checked: 22 October 2026
- 01Returnrecorded against the employee from HR
- 02Preparationcleaning, checks and repair
- 03Readinessa status visible to whoever hands it out
- 04Hand-outassigned to a new person
- 05Historyevery assignment kept with the device
The laptop came back. What does the team see next?
Say an employee hands in a laptop on their last day. HR has recorded the departure, the person taking the equipment logs the return in a spreadsheet, and the device record stays in the ITSM, the IT service management system. The computer is already in the IT department, waiting to be prepared for its next hand-out.
In a useful view, the person planning equipment for a new employee would see at once that this specific laptop has come back and still needs preparation. A technician could open the work linked to it and, once it is done, mark the device as ready. The computer would then appear on the list of equipment available to hand out. The history would show who used it before and when it was returned.
The improvement would be that the return is recorded once, and the next person uses that record. Today you may need to copy the laptop's number from the spreadsheet into the ITSM and reply separately to HR. Once these places are connected, IT could confirm the return against the right device, and HR could see that information next to the employee's departure. Preparation would stay a separate piece of IT work, with a visible result.
The device number matters here. Two laptops of the same model can be in different hands and need different work. The team has to recognise the specific unit in the spreadsheet and in the system before a connection starts carrying information about returns. Check that the same number points to the same laptop in each of these places.
A ready asset tracking register can handle return and preparation
You do not need to order your own program just to record hand-outs. The Snipe-IT documentation describes unique asset tags and checking equipment out to users and back in. Handing a device to the next person requires the return to be recorded first (asset tracking basics in Snipe-IT).
This product also tells equipment ready to hand out apart from equipment waiting for preparation. The example in the documentation concerns a computer waiting to have its system re-prepared. After the work is done, IT can change its state to ready to deploy. That matches the basic need in our example, so look at such a flow in the existing tool before you commission a register.
If the employee is to confirm receipt, Snipe-IT also provides acceptance of equipment and an optional on-screen signature. That needs the right settings, including turning on acceptance for the device category (settings for confirming receipt).
What are you actually paying for in the ITSM?
If a broad ITSM suite mainly holds your laptop records, compare the features you use with a smaller asset tracking program. Also check the modules available and the terms of your current contract. Narrowing the scope or improving the configuration may be enough. When the team uses ticket handling and other parts of the suite, moving the register alone has to take those links into account.
Only a need that remains after such a comparison justifies your own app. In the case described, it may be retyping information about the departure and the return between HR, the spreadsheet and the device record. If a ready register keeps the equipment well, an integration could connect it to the employee departure process and to the task of preparing the laptop. Before choosing this path, confirm what data the systems in use let you read and write.
A narrower app makes sense when several people take part in the hand-over, and the current tools keep making them repeat entries or explain who has the device. It could offer a simple view of the return and the preparation of equipment, leaving tickets in the ITSM. Base the first scope on one laptop's path from return to the next hand-out. That lets you judge whether the new tool removes copying or only adds another screen to fill in.
If the equipment then goes to an outside partner and a repair has to be handed over, a separate question of access to the matter arises. We cover that scope in the article on a request system for a service network.
What to move from the old records
When changing tools, both the laptop's current user and earlier hand-overs matter. The team should know which history it will move and which it will go back to in the archive. Devices already returned but still waiting for preparation need particular care. A missing assigned employee alone should not make them appear ready to hand out.
Test the import on your own records. Snipe-IT has a basic history importer, but it needs the devices and users to exist in the system already, and it skips extra fields. That does not mean moving the whole spreadsheet with all its notes (importing history in Snipe-IT). So before migrating, settle where the information needed to keep handling the laptop will stay.
With an integration, settle who deals with a case where IT records a return and HR still does not see it. The team needs a way to report and clear up such a discrepancy, and the supplier an agreed scope of upkeep for the connection. Also discuss ownership of the code and data, and exporting the equipment history. If another supplier is to take over support of the app, they should get access, on agreed terms, to the code and the information needed to run the connections.
Syntalith builds custom apps. A possible project links the information about an employee's departure to the return of the laptop and its preparation, using the existing register where it already does its job. Start the conversation with the last return that had to be entered in several places. Tell us who took the device and how the next person knew it could be handed out. That is enough to start comparing a configuration change with the integration you need. A custom app or automation at Syntalith costs from €3,000 net (pricing).
What an equipment register costs and when it pays back
- Today
- 300 equipment events × 8 min = 40 h × €34.90 = €1,396
- With the system, a person checks the output in 30% of the time
- €419
- Model, 1 call per case, Claude Sonnet 5.5
- €3
- Cost of one case
- €4.65 today, €1.41 with the system
- Saving
- €974 a month
Payback of €3,000
3.1 months
The volume, the time and the checking share are the scenario's assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat. Model: 3,000 input tokens and 300 output tokens per call at Anthropic's rates, converted at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro.
- Time from receiving a case to the result, before and after the change
- Cases the app passed to a person
- Corrections by the person checking
- Model and maintenance cost at the target volume
Where to start
In the free process review we choose one process and count the team's volume and working time, and within 2 working days you get a written summary with a price. We build as part of AI apps, and we price maintenance separately.
Worked example · Scenario
How we count the payback: asset records
We run the same count for your IT team in the free process review.
€4,363
a month for handling 1,500 job emails
Payback: 0.8 mo.
5 minutes to read an email and reply and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 3,000 + 600 tokens per message with a draft reply, at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.
See the full calculation →