Skip to content

Blog · Published · Updated

IT asset tracking: standard software or custom?

Short answer

An equipment register should show whether a returned laptop is ready to hand out, without checking a spreadsheet and a record in the ITSM. A ready register, for example Snipe-IT, tells a return apart from readiness. An integration or your own app makes sense when the team still retypes data between HR and the asset records.

How we workDetails ↓

  1. 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
  2. 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
  3. 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
  4. 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
net per application, fixed price before contract
from €3,000
from signing the contract to acceptance
4–10 weeks
free prototype on your documents
€0

We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓

Author: Syntalith · 5 min read

Example: the morning request inbox
Agent · ready

Statistics

IT and AI: statistics 2026

3.1 mo.

payback of €3,000 at 300 equipment events a month: €1,396 of work today, €422 with checking and the model. Scenario.

Figures checked: 22 October 2026

A laptop from return to the next hand-out
  1. 01Returnrecorded against the employee from HR
  2. 02Preparationcleaning, checks and repair
  3. 03Readinessa status visible to whoever hands it out
  4. 04Hand-outassigned to a new person
  5. 05Historyevery assignment kept with the device

The laptop came back. What does the team see next?

Say an employee hands in a laptop on their last day. HR has recorded the departure, the person taking the equipment logs the return in a spreadsheet, and the device record stays in the ITSM, the IT service management system. The computer is already in the IT department, waiting to be prepared for its next hand-out.

In a useful view, the person planning equipment for a new employee would see at once that this specific laptop has come back and still needs preparation. A technician could open the work linked to it and, once it is done, mark the device as ready. The computer would then appear on the list of equipment available to hand out. The history would show who used it before and when it was returned.

The improvement would be that the return is recorded once, and the next person uses that record. Today you may need to copy the laptop's number from the spreadsheet into the ITSM and reply separately to HR. Once these places are connected, IT could confirm the return against the right device, and HR could see that information next to the employee's departure. Preparation would stay a separate piece of IT work, with a visible result.

The device number matters here. Two laptops of the same model can be in different hands and need different work. The team has to recognise the specific unit in the spreadsheet and in the system before a connection starts carrying information about returns. Check that the same number points to the same laptop in each of these places.

A ready asset tracking register can handle return and preparation

You do not need to order your own program just to record hand-outs. The Snipe-IT documentation describes unique asset tags and checking equipment out to users and back in. Handing a device to the next person requires the return to be recorded first (asset tracking basics in Snipe-IT).

This product also tells equipment ready to hand out apart from equipment waiting for preparation. The example in the documentation concerns a computer waiting to have its system re-prepared. After the work is done, IT can change its state to ready to deploy. That matches the basic need in our example, so look at such a flow in the existing tool before you commission a register.

If the employee is to confirm receipt, Snipe-IT also provides acceptance of equipment and an optional on-screen signature. That needs the right settings, including turning on acceptance for the device category (settings for confirming receipt).

What are you actually paying for in the ITSM?

If a broad ITSM suite mainly holds your laptop records, compare the features you use with a smaller asset tracking program. Also check the modules available and the terms of your current contract. Narrowing the scope or improving the configuration may be enough. When the team uses ticket handling and other parts of the suite, moving the register alone has to take those links into account.

Only a need that remains after such a comparison justifies your own app. In the case described, it may be retyping information about the departure and the return between HR, the spreadsheet and the device record. If a ready register keeps the equipment well, an integration could connect it to the employee departure process and to the task of preparing the laptop. Before choosing this path, confirm what data the systems in use let you read and write.

A narrower app makes sense when several people take part in the hand-over, and the current tools keep making them repeat entries or explain who has the device. It could offer a simple view of the return and the preparation of equipment, leaving tickets in the ITSM. Base the first scope on one laptop's path from return to the next hand-out. That lets you judge whether the new tool removes copying or only adds another screen to fill in.

If the equipment then goes to an outside partner and a repair has to be handed over, a separate question of access to the matter arises. We cover that scope in the article on a request system for a service network.

What to move from the old records

When changing tools, both the laptop's current user and earlier hand-overs matter. The team should know which history it will move and which it will go back to in the archive. Devices already returned but still waiting for preparation need particular care. A missing assigned employee alone should not make them appear ready to hand out.

Test the import on your own records. Snipe-IT has a basic history importer, but it needs the devices and users to exist in the system already, and it skips extra fields. That does not mean moving the whole spreadsheet with all its notes (importing history in Snipe-IT). So before migrating, settle where the information needed to keep handling the laptop will stay.

With an integration, settle who deals with a case where IT records a return and HR still does not see it. The team needs a way to report and clear up such a discrepancy, and the supplier an agreed scope of upkeep for the connection. Also discuss ownership of the code and data, and exporting the equipment history. If another supplier is to take over support of the app, they should get access, on agreed terms, to the code and the information needed to run the connections.

Syntalith builds custom apps. A possible project links the information about an employee's departure to the return of the laptop and its preparation, using the existing register where it already does its job. Start the conversation with the last return that had to be entered in several places. Tell us who took the device and how the next person knew it could be handed out. That is enough to start comparing a configuration change with the integration you need. A custom app or automation at Syntalith costs from €3,000 net (pricing).

What an equipment register costs and when it pays back

Scenario: 300 equipment events a month
Today
300 equipment events × 8 min = 40 h × €34.90 = €1,396
With the system, a person checks the output in 30% of the time
€419
Model, 1 call per case, Claude Sonnet 5.5
€3
Cost of one case
€4.65 today, €1.41 with the system
Saving
€974 a month

Payback of €3,000

3.1 months

The volume, the time and the checking share are the scenario's assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat. Model: 3,000 input tokens and 300 output tokens per call at Anthropic's rates, converted at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro.

What we measure in the trial
  • Time from receiving a case to the result, before and after the change
  • Cases the app passed to a person
  • Corrections by the person checking
  • Model and maintenance cost at the target volume

Where to start

In the free process review we choose one process and count the team's volume and working time, and within 2 working days you get a written summary with a price. We build as part of AI apps, and we price maintenance separately.

Worked example · Scenario

How we count the payback: asset records

We run the same count for your IT team in the free process review.

€4,363

a month for handling 1,500 job emails

Payback: 0.8 mo.

5 minutes to read an email and reply and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 3,000 + 600 tokens per message with a draft reply, at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.

See the full calculation →

This is how we implement it in companies

All case studies →

Client results.

All projects →
foap.comcustomer service

foap.com customer service: 95% of replies are sent automatically.

Users from several countries write to foap.com, in several languages. The system reads the entire conversation and the terms of that person, and then sends a response in that person's language. Questions about money and exceptions go to the team with a ready draft, so they have to check and send them.

the system sends the answers itself, without human typing
95%
time from the arrival of the e-mail to the ready response (median)
30 s
e-mails that require a response receive a ready-made draft
100%
less work for every 1000 answers (estimate)
47 h

Data from foap.com production, October 20-21, 2026. Estimate: 3 minutes for handwritten response.

How foap.com customer service works →
Sample messages. Money matters always come to the person.

Other implementations

jaktako.design

studio projektowe

−87%

Time to look for new customers, every day

4 hours → 30 min

approx. 73 hours less per month (21 days of work)

according to the studio

How the agent loop works →
Signature Estates

real estate

approx. −90%

Operator time spent browsing portals, per day

2–3 hours → 20 min

approx. 45 hours less per month (21 days of work)

respect · contact the seller 5 minutes after the announcement

How the agent finds property listings →
Kuba Koziej, CEO and co-founder of MoreGrowth and board member at Natu.Care

Kuba Koziej

CEO and co-founder, MoreGrowth

„We started with my own AI agent. During the training that followed, I learned to build new applications myself. Today I am bringing this way of working with AI into my business. Working with Syntalith gave me exactly the skills and tools I needed.”

View the original training review on LinkedIn ↗

When an off-the-shelf tool does not fit, we build your own.Book a free process review (30 min) →

How we build automation and agents

From a conversation to a working system in four steps.

  1. 01 · 30 min

    Free process review

    €0

    You're talking to an engineer. You receive the written plan within 2 business days.

  2. 02 · 5 days

    Free prototype

    €0

    The system works on 20-100 cases that your team has already handled. You see every result.

  3. 03 · 2–16 weeks

    Build

    50%

    Fixed price and goal written in the contract. First installment upon signing.

  4. 04 · after reaching the goal

    Reception

    50%

    You pay the second installment when the system reaches its target on your cases.

How a free prototype is created

Mon.

We set a goal

What result do you consider good?

Tue–Wed

The system is working

It goes through your affairs, one by one.

Thu

We compare

We check every difference with the team's work.

Fri

Result and price

List of errors and fixed implementation price.

You choose the matters. We anonymize them upon request, they stay in the EU and we delete them after the test.

On the market, such a test usually costs from PLN 3,000 to PLN 8,000.

Book a free process review (30 min)

We establish a prototype during a free analysis.

Data checked on October 25, 2026.

„Is my data safe?”

Yes. You choose where they go: from your company account to the model on your server.

  1. 00Employee's private account

    Customer and company data ends up in an account that the company cannot see or control. There is no data processing agreement, so it is a violation of the GDPR. When an employee leaves, the chat history goes with them.

  2. 01ChatGPT or Claude corporate account

    The provider does not use your data to train models. A copy of the queries remains in his logs for up to 30 days.

  3. 02API with zero retention (ZDR)

    The provider processes the request and does not save anything. It requires his consent, we prepare the application together.

  4. 03Processing in the EU

    Queries are counted and stored in Europe: OpenAI in the EU region, Claude via clouds with the EU region.

  5. 04Model at your place

    The open model runs on your server or in your cloud in the EU. The data does not go outside the company.

What we do with every implementation

  • Confidentiality agreement and data processing agreement before we receive any data.
  • You choose the cases for the prototype and we anonymize them upon request.
  • The data stays in the EU and we delete it after the test.
  • Corporate accounts with an administrator on your side.

When data cannot leave the company

The open model runs on your server or in your cloud in the EU. To choose from:

White-tailed eagle
Polish model, SpeakLeash and ACK Cyfronet AGH
PLLUM
Polish model, HIVE consortium commissioned by the Ministry of Digitization
Qwen
Alibaba
GLM
Zhipu AI
DeepSeek
DeepSeek

We select a model for the task and check it on your cases. We run it, tune it and maintain it.

Source: Bielik and PLLuM, ACK Cyfronet AGH ↗ · PLLuM, Ministry of Digitization ↗

Do you have a lot of your own data? We will fine-tune the small model.

  1. 1 Your examples
  2. 2 tuning
  3. 3 test on new cases
  4. 4 model at your place

When you have thousands of similar emails, documents or reports, we teach a small open model based on your examples. It works for you, responds quickly and costs less to maintain than a large model. We measure quality on issues that the model has not seen while learning.

Przemysław and Piotr did it in large programming and consulting companies. Artem did it before and does it today at Syntalith. It's about models on your own infrastructure, tuning and quality measurement.

You choose the protection level during the interview. We sign the data processing agreement before we see any data.Schedule a free analysis →

Custom AI apps

When an off-the-shelf tool does not fit, we build your own.

We build an application with a language model for the work of your team: searching the company's knowledge, case panel or portal. We check the validity of your documents before launch, and the code stays with you.

See AI applications →
net per application, fixed price before contract
from €3,000
from signing the contract to acceptance
4–10 weeks
free prototype on your documents
€0

Questions

  • Will your own equipment register replace the ITSM?

    It can replace part of the asset records, if you pay for a large ITSM mainly for that function. Tickets and changes stay in the system that handles them well.

  • When is a ready equipment register enough?

    When it separates return, preparation and readiness to hand out, and the history import keeps past assignments. An HR integration makes sense with frequent staff changes.

  • How much does it cost?

    At Syntalith apps, automations and AI agents start from €3,000 net. At 300 equipment events a month of 8 minutes each, the payback is 3.1 months.

Let's talk

Just write, call or choose a date.

We work fast because we hate corporate cotton wool. We don't have salespeople or managers to keep an eye on managers. You talk immediately to engineers who then build your system. We respect each other's time and yours too.

We will accept 3 more companies by the end of the year.

Mon–Fri 9:00–17:00 CET

What our OpenAI and Anthropic partnerships mean for you.

OpenAI makes ChatGPT and Anthropic makes Claude. We belong to the partnership programs of both companies, so we work with their tools every day and learn from the creators themselves.

OpenAI Select PartnerClaude Partner Network
01We will select a tool for the task
We implement both ChatGPT and Claude. We check both on your documents, and you choose the one that makes fewer corrections and saves more time.
02Knowledge straight from the creators
We learn from official OpenAI and Anthropic courses and materials. Your team learns about the features and settings that work today.
03Licenses without our margin
When we roll out ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot, you buy the licences directly from OpenAI, Anthropic or Microsoft and they invoice you. We add nothing to the licence.
04Certified engineers
On the team, we have an AWS certification in machine learning and an Anthropic certification in systems architecture on Claude.

Participation in programs does not mean that OpenAI or Anthropic endorses our services.