Blog · Published · Updated
One PDF, several documents: how AI can identify them
Short answer
An AI model can split a PDF with several documents into separate index entries, each with the document type and page range. First check a ready classifier and the features of your current document system, and consider customisation for recurring mistakes. In a scenario of 400 PDF bundles a month, a ready classifier cuts errors from 30% to 12%, and fine-tuning to 5%, which together saves 17 hours of corrections, or €582 a month.
How we workDetails ↓
- 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
- 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
- 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
- 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
- model on your server or in the cloud in the EU
- quoted after the review
- same work in application with EU cloud model
- from €3,000
- task, data and equipment analysis
- €0
We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓
Author: Syntalith · 3 min read
Statistics
Law firms and AI: statistics 2026
17 h
fewer corrections a month at 400 PDF bundles: a ready classifier cuts errors from 30% to 12%, fine-tuning to 5%, at 10 minutes per correction. Scenario.
48.8%
According to Eurostat (2025), 48.8% of EU enterprises that considered AI but did not use it named concerns about data protection and privacy.
48%
According to the European Commission (2026), 48% of EU SMEs and mid-caps name a lack of expertise as a barrier to AI.
Source: European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 578 (2026) ↗
40.4%
According to Eurostat (2025), 40.4% of EU enterprises in professional, scientific and technical activities used AI.
49%
According to the European Commission (2026), 49% of EU SMEs and mid-caps name legal uncertainty as a barrier to AI.
Source: European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 578 (2026) ↗
Figures checked: 22 October 2026
A contract, an amendment and a message in one file
A law firm receives a bundle: pages 1–4 are a services contract, pages 5–6 a separate amendment, and page 7 a printed email. In the index the whole file is called „contract”, so anyone looking for the amendment has to open it and go through the pages.
A useful proposal shows three entries: the contract on pages 1–4, the amendment on 5–6 and the message on page 7. An employee opens the places named, checks the boundaries and approves the split. The original bundle stays available. The boundary between documents is what matters: if the last page of the contract lands in the amendment, a correct type name helps little. The classifier assigns a document to an agreed type and does not judge whether the document is valid, signed or has legal effect.
- 01Bundlethe original PDF stays unchanged
- 02Proposaldocument type and page range
- 03Uncertaina part with no type, with its place in the file
- 04Checkthe employee corrects boundaries and names
- 05Recordthe index kept with the matter in the document workflow
What a simpler change gives, and what training adds
- Today: 30% errors × 400 × 10 min
- 20 h (€698)
- After a change with no training (ready classifier): 12%
- 8 h (€279)
- After fine-tuning: 5%
- 3 h (€116)
- The simpler change saves 12 h, fine-tuning adds 5 h (€163) a month
Compare fine-tuning with the cost of examples, training and re-evaluation
The error shares and the correction time are the scenario's assumptions, which we measure on the client's cases not used for training. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat.
In this count, a ready classifier gives most of the effect for a fraction of the cost. Training makes sense at a larger scale or when the remaining errors are expensive. A short cover note does not have to fit the contract category just because it comes before the contract's pages, so the view leaves such parts for an employee to identify.
- Evaluation cases kept apart from training examples
- The same set for the current model, the simpler change and the customised model
- Answers prepared by the people who correct the results today
- Errors counted separately for each kind of mistake
- A plan to re-evaluate after a change of base model or process
The set of training examples has to be maintained: when the process, the naming or the base model changes, the evaluation is repeated on the same test set. We put that cost into the quote together with the training itself.
First check the intake and ready-made tools
When senders can send separate, clearly named files, part of the sorting disappears at intake. Your document management system may have features for splitting bundles that the team does not yet use. Microsoft describes the custom classifier in Document Intelligence, which recognises trained document types and their page ranges in a bundle. Judge a wrong document name and a wrongly drawn split separately, because they are different corrections. Customisation makes sense when the tool regularly joins an amendment to the contract before it with similar-looking documents. Further work on organised case files is described in the article on local AI in a law firm.
Senders can send separate files
a rule for sending documents
no build
Mixed bundles, typical types
a ready classifier with a view for corrections
application from €3,000
Recurring mistakes at the boundaries
customisation on the firm's examples
priced after the comparison
Where to start
The comparison covers bundles not used for customisation. The person who handles documents checks that every part is in the index and that the links lead to the right pages. We run model customisation as part of private LLMs, and the application in which the employee sees the result beside its source as part of AI applications. For the free analysis, a few examples of an error that keeps coming back and a note on who corrects it today are enough.
Worked example · Scenario
How we count the payback: documents in a law firm
We run the same count for your firm in the free analysis.
€1,861
a month for handling 800 documents by hand
Payback: 1.9 mo.
4 minutes per document matched to a case and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: reading a document in our case-file system (about €0.0002) plus matching it to the case and a note on what is missing (Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 2,000 + 300 tokens), at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.
See the full calculation →