Local document search across languages

Syntalith can compare that approach with the current search tool and a glossary of company terminology. The proposed view shows a passage, its source language and a document link. The team first assesses whether it reaches useful material; translation or answer generation can be agreed separately.

Different words for the same topic

Suppose an employee searches in Polish for handing over support after a project ends. The report uses “service handover.” The application can surface the relevant section even though it contains no Polish words. It also returns a report about handing over goods, which concerns a different activity.

The user opens the passages and selects the relevant material. A reviewer who knows both languages helps assess whether search preserves the question's meaning. Similar terms need not describe the same task. A company glossary can clarify the distinction for later searches.

A retrieval model need not write answers

The BGE-M3 model card describes multilingual retrieval capabilities. This is one approach to assess for a company collection. Its multilingual description does not replace a trial on the team's actual language pairs and terminology.

A useful result may be a list of passages. Someone able to read the source may not need another summary. Explaining results in the query language is a separate function requiring its own assessment. Distinguish these needs in the commission so the team does not build a full assistant when the main gap is search.

When a glossary and ordinary search are enough

For a small set of recurring terms, record equivalents in the languages used. This is particularly useful for product names and internal abbreviations. If the existing library searches text well, adding those terms may solve the problem without another model.

Multilingual retrieval is worth trying for longer descriptions and questions that cannot be reduced to a few known terms. Include questions the collection cannot answer. Users need the available results, without an invented source made to fit their question.

What the team assesses

Document users identify questions they currently translate manually or pass to a colleague. A bilingual reviewer checks whether the retrieved passage addresses the need and whether the original opens at a useful location. They also assess the work needed after opening a result.

If material must stay in the company's environment, include text preparation and any query translation in that requirement. With IT, agree on services, copies and document access. Users should not receive a foreign-language source they are not permitted to read in its original form.

Proposed Syntalith scope can start with one collection and the required language pairs. We compare ordinary search with a glossary and multilingual retrieval. After reviewing passages, the team can decide whether it also needs explanations or integration with its existing library.

Tell us about a question that is hard to express in the documents' language. We can discuss the material and how to assess relevance. See our pricing page for information about estimates.