Blog · Published · Updated
Custom customer quality document portals
Short answer
A quality document portal shows the customer their delivery, the batch assigned to it and the approved document that covers it. A file with a similar product name is not enough: the batch and the current issue are what count. First check sharing in your current quality system or document library. At Syntalith the application costs from €3,000 net. At 300 document requests a month of 15 minutes each, it pays back in 1.3 months.
How we workDetails ↓
- 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
- 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
- 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
- 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
- net per application, fixed price before contract
- from €3,000
- from signing the contract to acceptance
- 4–10 weeks
- free prototype on your documents
- €0
We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓
Author: Syntalith · 3 min read
Statistics
Quality and documents: statistics 2026
1.3 mo.
payback of a €3,000 application at 300 document requests a month: €2,618 of work today, €263 with checking and the model. Scenario.
55.0%
According to Eurostat (2025), 55.0% of large EU enterprises with 250 or more employees used AI.
20.0%
According to Eurostat (2025), 20.0% of EU enterprises with at least 10 employees used AI.
50%
According to the European Commission (2026), half of EU SMEs and mid-caps name high investment costs as a barrier to AI.
Source: European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 578 (2026) ↗
47%
According to the European Commission (2026), customer service is the most common use of AI among EU SMEs and mid-caps that already use it, at 47%.
Source: European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 578 (2026) ↗
Figures checked: 22 October 2026
The document for this specific delivery
A customer asks for the quality certificate for a batch of material they received. A customer service employee finds a certificate in a folder for a product with a similar name, but with a different batch number, so they turn to the delivery record and keep searching. In the portal, the customer opens their delivery, sees the batch and downloads the approved document that covers it. A note that an earlier issue was replaced explains why the file differs from the one the customer has.
This view needs links in the data: someone names the delivery's batch and assigns to it a document approved for sharing. The quality department is responsible for the content and for approving a new issue, and the portal shares the named file with the right customer. When there is no approved document yet, the customer sees the gap and can ask a question.
- 01Deliverythe customer sees their deliveries after signing in
- 02Batchassigned to the delivery in the company's data
- 03Documentthe approved issue that covers the batch
- 04Replacementa note about the earlier issue
- 05Gapa message and a question to customer service in place of another batch's document
- The customer downloads documents, with no right to change files
- Access only to their own deliveries
- Earlier issues visible as the company decides
- The quality department approves every publication
What it costs and when it pays back
- Today
- 300 document requests × 15 min = 75 h (€2,618)
- With the system, a person checks the output in 10% of the time
- €262
- Model, 1 call per case, Claude Sonnet 5.5
- €1
- Cost of one case
- €8.73 today, €0.88 with the system
- Saving
- €2,355 a month
Payback of €3,000
1.3 months
The volume, the time and the checking share are the scenario's assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat. Model: 1,500 input tokens and 200 output tokens per call at Anthropic's rates, at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.
The count covers the work around a case: searching, reading, writing and handing over. What remains is the time to check the result, 10% of today's work in the scenario. Before the quote, we measure both times on 20 to 100 cases the team has already handled, in a free test that takes 5 working days.
The model is not the main part here. It helps match a customer's request from an email to a delivery, and most of the saving comes from linking the batch to the approved document.
First the library or your current quality system
If you use a quality management system, ask the vendor about sharing documents with customers and show them one delivery with a replaced document. With a simpler flow, an organised library is enough: Microsoft describes sharing in SharePoint with people outside the organisation, depending on the organisation's and the site's settings. A guest added as a site member can get edit rights, so you set the scope of permissions separately. A portal is justified when customer service regularly pieces together information from several places and the tools give no easy access to the documents for a specific delivery.
Few customers, simple sharing
a library with external access
configuration
The quality system can publish to customers
switching the feature on in your current system
licence
Batches and documents in several systems
a portal linking delivery, batch and issue
€3,000–€7,000
Where to start
The first scope can cover one type of document and the customers who ask most often. The test of the project is one question: does a signed-in customer find the right document for their delivery without contacting customer service. The flow of corrections and approvals is described in document workflow in quality control. We build this kind of rollout as part of AI applications. For the free analysis, a description of one case from recent weeks and of the tools it passed through is enough. You do not need to send confidential documents, and you get a written plan within 2 working days.
Worked example · Scenario
How we count the payback: quality documents
We run the same count for your customers in the free analysis.
€1,396
a month for handling 600 documents by hand
Payback: 2.5 mo.
4 minutes per document matched to a case and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: reading a document in our case-file system (about €0.0002) plus matching it to the case and a note on what is missing (Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 2,000 + 300 tokens), at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.
See the full calculation →