The same delivery date in ERP, CRM, and the portal
The coordinator has entered the agreed delivery date in the ERP, but the sales rep still sees the old date in the CRM. Someone has to copy it over, then check the customer portal. Automating delivery date synchronization can take over that repetitive work. The agreed arrival date reaches the people who use it, while the warehouse keeps its separate shipping date.
Syntalith
Friday for the customer, Thursday for the warehouse
Suppose a company has agreed to deliver an order to its customer on Friday. The goods need to leave the warehouse on Thursday. The coordinator has both dates in the ERP, the system used to manage orders and fulfillment. The sales rep's CRM still shows an earlier delivery date: Wednesday. The customer portal gets its date from the CRM.
The coordinator has to open the second application, find the same order, and change Wednesday to Friday. They then check that the portal also shows Friday. Each subsequent change means repeating those steps, even though the new date has already been agreed and recorded.
Connecting the two systems can carry Friday's delivery date from the ERP order to the corresponding CRM record. The customer portal then uses the corrected information. The rep sees the date the coordinator entered without having to ask which copy is current. The warehouse still plans to send the goods out on Thursday. Both dates are right for the people using them.
That connection requires agreement on where the company records the agreed date and how it identifies the same order in both applications. A customer name is not enough when that customer has several open orders. In an implementation discussion, show the record the coordinator updates and the screen the rep uses. Those two views explain the work more clearly than a general request to “synchronize dates.”
Check what the existing system already calculates
Separate order dates are part of established business software. Microsoft describes how Business Central calculates delivery and shipping dates using item availability, warehouse handling, and transportation time. Its documentation distinguishes the customer's requested delivery date from planned shipment and delivery dates, among other fields.
If your company uses those capabilities, first ask the administrator which date is being copied into the CRM. The problem may be the selected field or a missing connection. Rebuilding the calculations outside the ERP would create another place to maintain delivery assumptions.
Giving reps access to the relevant order view in the existing system may be enough. They would no longer need another copy of the date. If the CRM and customer portal do need to store it, ask your vendor whether your applications support the required connection.
A new estimate goes to the order coordinator first
Further planning may produce an estimated date that differs from the one agreed with the customer. The coordinator needs it to assess the situation. In our example, a later calculation does not itself change the Friday agreement. The company reviews the proposal and agrees any change through its order-handling process. Once recorded, the agreed date can reach the other views as the customer commitment.
Microsoft also describes calculating possible fulfillment dates in Business Central from known and expected item availability. Those calculations can support planning. Moving an agreed date between clearly identified fields can be handled by an integration without AI.
When goods are already in transit and someone needs an answer from the carrier, there is a different task to handle. Our article on following up on delayed B2B deliveries covers that work. Synchronization removes differences between copies of a known date; it cannot supply missing transportation information.
The coordinator can see when an update has not arrived
Now suppose the CRM connection is temporarily unavailable after the coordinator records Friday. The coordinator should be able to see that the order is waiting for an update in the second application. The rep needs an indication that Wednesday is no longer a current confirmation. They then know to check the order with the coordinator before answering the customer.
The project should also address how the customer portal presents that situation, so an old date does not appear current. When the connection is restored, the responsible employee can check that Friday reached both places. This is a specific part of the work to include alongside transferring the date itself.
For this type of project, Syntalith can connect the agreed-date record with the views used by employees and customers. The proposed initial scope covers one type of order and the company's existing systems. Using an order they know, the coordinator and rep check whether a delivery change reaches the right place while the warehouse retains its separate shipping date. If an existing connection or shared view already supports the work, the project may only need to improve how it is used.
You can start a conversation about automating data updates by explaining where your team copies dates from and where they go. The application names and a description of the last change are enough to begin. See Syntalith's pricing page for pricing information.
Reduce manual work in a defined process
Start with where work gets stuck and who has to repair it. We will compare the available improvements with implementation and operating costs.
Explore AI automation