The tag view groups articles by a concrete operational problem or implementation type, without exposing hundreds of raw frontmatter labels.
Syntalith fits small and medium-sized Polish companies best when they want their first AI process in production at a fixed price. For large programmes in corporations, deepsense.ai and Addepto are the better choice. Vstorm leads in building agents, 10Clouds in banking and insurance, VM.PL in manufacturing, Protopia on Microsoft Azure and allclouds.pl in the public sector.
Look at Space and Pages in ChatGPT when several people edit one piece of material. Projects fit a case run through many conversations, files and instructions. Choose Claude Cowork when a task needs several operations on files and handing over finished results. At Syntalith a rollout of the chosen tool for 10 people costs from €1,150 net and at one hour saved a week pays back in 0.9 months.
You choose between DeepSeek Harness, Hermes Agent and OpenClaw by the task: work on files on a computer, scheduled tasks on a server, or action inside the company's apps. Harness is an open public preview built on plugins, and Hermes and OpenClaw are open agents under the MIT licence. Your own agent on a server, with the model and upkeep, costs about €332 a month in our scenario.
OpenAI dots and Meta Muse are services the makers maintain. You run Hermes Agent and OpenClaw on your own server. In Poland, dots works on the Business Premium plan in supported regions and as a beta in Enterprise, but not yet on Pro. According to Meta, Muse is available in the US and Canada. Your own agent gives control, but the server, the model and the upkeep are on your side.
You buy ChatGPT or Claude training in two ways: seats on an open course or a programme for your own team. An open course has a fixed scope, a closed workshop teaches on your company's tasks. Prices use different units: from PLN 1,400 per person to PLN 10,000 per group day. Syntalith runs training from €1,150 net a day, combined with a rollout.
If the company has already approved ChatGPT, train in ChatGPT. If it approved Claude, train in Claude: people practise in the tool they will return to after the sessions. A comparison workshop makes sense when the decision is open or one team has needs the current tool does not meet. A training day at Syntalith costs from €1,150 net and pays back in 0.9 months for 10 people saving an hour a week.
Choose a ChatGPT project for a case that develops: a quote for one client with further agreements. Choose a custom GPT to share the company's way of doing a task with a whole department. Keeping these needs apart makes documents easier to maintain and limits mixing of client data. Neither one needs an app built on the API.
OpenCode has a documented path to local models through an OpenAI-compatible interface. Claude Code does not officially support models other than Claude, so in our test it needed an emulation of the Anthropic interface. On the same long task with a local Qwen3.8-27B, Qwen Code scored 100 out of 100 in 502 seconds, and Claude Code through emulation 98 points in 1,732 seconds.
Fixing the same Go bug took a local Qwen3.8-27B 502.14 s on a modified vLLM and 1468.76 s on llama.cpp, with scores of 100/100 and 98/100. The whole profile differed: the engine, the weight format, the KV memory and the context limit, so the result points to a configuration for further trials and does not measure the advantage of the engine alone.
The same local model, Qwen3.8-27B, fixed code differently depending on the program that drove it. In a long Go task, Qwen Code finished in 8:22 with a score of 100/100, Codex in 19:10 with a bug that made us reject the change, and Claude Code in 28:52 with 98/100. In a shorter CSV import, OpenCode prepared the fastest correct change, in 89 seconds.
An AI app makes sense when a person needs a new place to work and approves the result themselves. An automation carries out steps in the background that you can describe before the start. An AI agent chooses the next steps based on the content of the case, within the rules. At Syntalith each form starts from €3,000 net, and delivery takes 2 to 16 weeks.
Off-the-shelf SaaS costs less at the start and lets you run a pilot within days. A custom AI app wins over a longer period, when the process is stable, many people use it and the product's price grows with every licence and feature. In a 36-month scenario the app costs €42,720 and SaaS €49,056, and the costs level after 25 months.
ChatGPT suits analysis, writing and work with files. Microsoft 365 Copilot is the natural start for a company working in Word, Excel, Outlook and Teams. A dedicated agent makes sense when a repeatable process runs through unusual systems and needs its own rules, approvals and history of actions. Start with a ready tool. ChatGPT Business costs $20 per person with annual billing.
A ready platform wins when knowledge lives in one ecosystem, for example Microsoft 365 or Confluence, and the questions concern that content. Your own knowledge base wins with many sources, strict permissions or data that may not leave the company. For 120 people over 24 months, licences at $21 cost €53,976, and your own system from €3,000 with the model costs €4,748, before maintenance, which we price per project.
Claude Team costs $20 per person a month for a Standard seat with annual billing, or $25 with monthly billing. A Premium seat costs $100 or $125 and gives five times more usage than Standard. Team covers 2 to 150 people. Enterprise bills access and usage separately, so the choice depends on the management features and the bill for the whole team.
A team of agents in CrewAI is worth choosing only when it gives a better result than one agent on the same tasks, criteria and tools. In counterparty research, three roles usually use several times more model calls: at 200 files a month that is about €77.11 against €25.70 for a single agent. Scenario.
You compare agent frameworks on the same set of cases, with the same answer format and one test endpoint. In our demonstrator six technologies, from LangGraph to plain Python, run 50 cases, including 12 required refusals. The result points to two candidates for a pilot on a company process.
Choose ChatGPT for conversation, analysis and material a person judges. Copilot suits work in an editor, an office suite or a CRM. OpenClaw makes sense when the system goes through several steps on files and tools in a restricted environment. ChatGPT Business costs $20 per person with annual billing. OpenClaw has a €0 licence, but needs a server, a model and care.
n8n bills full workflow executions and runs in the cloud or on your own server. Make runs in the cloud and counts credits, usually 1 credit per module action. You choose on one process, including errors, retries and the cost of maintenance. At Syntalith an automation costs from €3,000 net, and with 800 form orders a month at 5 minutes each it pays back in 1.5 months.
Hermes Agent and OpenClaw are open-source agents under the MIT licence that run on your own infrastructure, and they suit different jobs. Hermes learns a process, remembers between sessions and works in the background on a schedule. OpenClaw is a personal assistant you reach from many messengers and devices. The licences cost €0, and a working agent with a server, a model and maintenance costs about €332 a month in our scenario.
Next step
Walk an engineer through it in 30 minutes. Within 2 business days you get, in writing, what it costs, what to do first and the starting price.
Times are shown in your own time zone. We work with clients across time zones.
See where to startOpenAI makes ChatGPT and Anthropic makes Claude. We belong to the partnership programs of both companies, so we work with their tools every day and learn from the creators themselves.
Claude Partner NetworkParticipation in programs does not mean that OpenAI or Anthropic endorses our services.