Articles grouped by business problem, industry, and system type.
A Polish model (Bielik, PLLuM) on your own infrastructure or a frontier API model (Claude, GPT, Gemini)? The decision is made per process, and four things settle it: data constraints, task difficulty, volume, and who maintains the infrastructure. Implementations start from €3,500 net, beginning with a free process scan.
AI training for a customer service team teaches five things on your real tickets: triage and priorities, reply drafts in the company's voice, a thread summary before taking a case over, answers grounded in your knowledge base with the source shown, and exception handling with escalation. At Syntalith it is a closed workshop from €1,200 net per day, run by an engineer. Start with the free process scan: 30 minutes and a written takeaway in two business days.
When an automation has no tests, its current behavior becomes the starting point. This migration compares 336 behaviors, records every discrepancy, and tests the return path before traffic moves.
A model should not decide the scope of law. In this AI Act register, rules in code select the relevant articles before the model drafts anything, and our own system appears in the same register.
Fabricated case citations have already led to sanctions for lawyers. In this research system, every proposition must contain an exact passage from the source text or fail validation.
A mistaken recording is harder to withdraw than text. In this listening desk, only a named reviewer can start speech synthesis, and every recording begins by telling the listener that a system is speaking.
A photo, voice note, and work card may disagree. In this field case file, the contradiction remains visible until a person resolves it, and model suggestions cannot affect the safety decision.
Is an agent crew worth its complexity? A controlled comparison gives both variants the same input, tools, model, and rubric. Both scored full marks, while CrewAI cost 4.325 times more in this run.
Client onboarding can take weeks, so the case must survive restarts. This workflow saves the files, history, and next step at defined checkpoints and restores them when work resumes.
A starting packet contains forwarded messages, attachments, and notes that may disagree. In this project room, every fact points to its source, duplicate forwards are detected, and a date conflict blocks the plan.
Framework comparisons often mix model quality with software overhead. This six-framework test uses deterministic responses, and the highest overhead came from the adapter in our own default stack.
A coding proposal that looks right and has no basis is AP automation's most expensive failure. Here is a payables desk where the model cites the supplier's precedent and a missing basis forces review.
A vision model that produces confident-sounding fields from an illegible scan is worse than no automation. Here is a legibility gate that measures the image in code before any model sees it.
In a management report the most dangerous thing is a number that exists in no source. Here is a renderer that builds the set of allowed numbers from approved figures and rejects commentary with any other digit.
n8n runs the flow, code matches SKUs and units, and uncertain lines wait for an operator. The system uses a model only to read an untidy order.
Confidentiality requirements often block AI deployments. These two systems make the boundary testable through a local model with outbound-connection checks and signed releases for a cut-off zone.
Permissions written only in model instructions are not enforceable controls. Here, every proposed action in the ERP, CRM, and document system passes through an external OPA policy decision.
Running OCR on a whole document can damage good text and increase cost. This PDF gateway checks each page, reads usable text locally, and sends only 64 of 496 pages to OCR.
Removing restricted citations from a finished answer is too late if the document already entered the model's context. This knowledge base enforces access in two layers before generation.
An outside document can try to give your system an order. Here is the architecture of tender monitoring where the reader has no tools and only a closed data contract reaches the planner.