Blog · Published · Updated
Field-work documentation: how the workflow works
Short answer
When a photo, a voice note and a job card from one call-out give different data, the AI system keeps each file separately, shows the conflicting values side by side and blocks closing the case until a coordinator decides. A convenient summary must not erase the difference between sources. At Syntalith the app costs from €3,000 net, and with 300 field call-outs a month at 15 minutes each it pays back in 1.6 months.
How we workDetails ↓
- 01Call30 minutes with an engineer, free
- 02PrototypeA working system on your process and data, free
- 03ImplementationTarget and fixed price in the contract; 50% at signing
- 04Acceptance50% once the agreed target is met
- analysis with an engineer and a free prototype
- €0
- team in ChatGPT or Claude, up to 10 people
- from €1,150
- automation, agent or application for one process
- from €3,000
We belong to the OpenAI and Anthropic partner programmes and learn through their official courses. What this means ↓
Author: Syntalith · 3 min read
Statistics
Field documentation: statistics 2026
1.6 mo.
payback of a €3,000 app at 300 field call-outs a month: €2,618 of work today, €796 with checking and the model. Scenario.
2 of 10
According to the Syntalith demonstrator (2026), 10 transcription samples of the same field recording returned 2 different texts, and 10 readings of the photo cost $0.047340 in total.
Source: Syntalith, field evidence package demonstrator (2026) ↗
90%
According to the European Commission (2026), 90% of companies using AI say people take the decisions, and 2% of decisions are fully automated.
Source: European Commission, Flash Eurobarometer 578 (2026) ↗
20.0%
According to Eurostat (2025), 20.0% of EU companies with at least 10 employees used AI.
Source: Eurostat, 20% of EU enterprises use AI technologies (2025) ↗
14–56%
According to Anthropic (2025), controlled studies found that AI cut task time by 14% to 56%.
Source: Anthropic, Estimating AI productivity gains (2025) ↗
Figures checked: 22 October 2026
Three sources, two machine numbers
A coordinator receives a photo, a voice message and a job card in PDF from the site. The card gives one machine number, and the technician says another in the recording. The photo shows the machine and liquid beneath it, and the nameplate is not visible. An ordinary summary would pick one number and hide a conflict that may matter for safety.
In our demonstrator each file enters the case file separately and keeps its source, time and author. The system compares the shared fields and shows the differing values side by side. An open conflict blocks closing the case file. The coordinator chooses a value present in the evidence, picks the basis from a closed list and signs the reasoning. The system does not identify the machine or the source of the liquid, and it does not release the machine for work.
- 01Photothe original with time and author, the description as a suggestion
- 02Voice notethe original for listening, the transcript as a suggestion
- 03Job carda PDF with fields to compare
- 04Comparisonshared fields, conflicting values side by side
- 05Decisionthe coordinator chooses the value and the basis, and signs
- One fictional case file and three test files
- A synthesised voice note, without site noise
- 10 readings of the photo for $0.047340 in total
- No measurement on different phones, languages and machine types
What a field evidence app costs and when it pays back
- Today
- 300 field call-outs × 15 min = 75 h × €34.90 = €2,618
- With the system, a person checks the output in 30% of the time
- €785
- Model, 3 calls per case, Claude Sonnet 5.5
- €11
- Cost of one case
- €8.73 today, €2.65 with the system
- Saving
- €1,822 a month
Payback of €3,000
1.6 months
The volume, the time and the checking share are the scenario's assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat. Model: 4,000 input tokens and 500 output tokens per call at Anthropic's rates, converted at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.
The count covers the work around a case: searching, reading, writing and passing it on. What stays is the time to check the output, 30% of today's work in the scenario. Before we quote, we measure both times on 20 to 100 cases your team has already handled, in a €0 test that takes 5 working days.
We leave 30% of today's work in the count because every conflict goes to the coordinator. According to the European Commission (2026), 90% of companies using AI say people take the decisions, and 2% of decisions are fully automated. In field cases this split follows from safety.
Why the transcript stays a suggestion
Ten transcription samples of the same recording returned two texts that differed in punctuation. That is why the case file keeps the audio and the original file, and the text is an aid for the coordinator. No reading of the photo settles the machine number when the nameplate is not in the picture. We write such limits down before the pilot, together with the rule that a model's suggestion never starts a machine and never replaces an inspection. Anthropic's guide to evaluating agents recommends running the same task many times, because a model's output changes between trials.
One source per call-out, no conflicts
a form in a mobile app
no AI
A photo, a recording and a card from one case
an evidence package with field comparison
from €3,000
Cases with a safety decision
a package with a closing block and a role signature
priced after the review
Where to start
The pilot covers a few types of event with an agreed result, a decision owner with acceptance criteria and material from real phones. To prepare: rules for storage and access. We build this kind of rollout as part of AI apps. For the free process review, a description of one case from recent weeks and the tools it went through is enough. You do not need to send confidential documents, and you get a written plan within 2 working days.
Worked example · Scenario
How we count the payback: cases from the field
We run the same count for your call-outs in the free process review.
€3,490
a month for writing the reports for 400 jobs
Payback: 1 mo.
15 minutes to write a work report and checking in 15% of the old time are our assumptions. €34.90 an hour is the EU average hourly labour cost for 2025 according to Eurostat, for companies with 10 or more employees. Model cost: reading a photo at €0.0042 (0.004734 USD), measured in our field documentation system, plus the description (Claude Sonnet 5.5, about 2,000 + 400 tokens), at the ECB rate of 1.1205 USD per euro on 22 October 2026.
See the full calculation →